Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.066
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0296723, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Central catheter bloodstream infections (CRBSI) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. However, few factors are generally accepted and some studies have conflicting finding about some factors, possibly caused by limitation associated with an individual study. This study was to identify risk factors for CRBSI in intensive care units. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science and EMBASE databases and the 4 top Chinese-language databases, including WanFang data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) as of July 2023. Case control and cohort studies were included. Two authors independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The pooled effect size was estimated using the odds ratio (OR), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. The Cochrane Q (χ2) and I2 tests were used to assess heterogeneity among studies, and each risk factor was tested for its robustness using fixed- or random-effects models. FINDINGS: A total of 32 studies enrolled, among which eleven factors were identified, they were divided into two categories: modifiable and unmodifiable factors. Modifiable factors: duration of catheterization (≥ 5d) (OR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.41-3.03), duration of catheterization (≥ 7d) (OR: 3.62, 95%CI: 2.65-4.97), duration of catheterization (≥ 14d)(OR: 4.85, 95%CI: 3.35-7.01), total parenteral nutrition (OR: 2.27,95%CI: 1.56-3.29), use of multiple-lumen catheters(OR: 3.41, 95%CI: 2.27-5.11), times of tube indwelling (OR: 3.50, 95%CI: 2.93-4.17), length of ICU stay (OR: 4.05, 95%CI: 2.41-6.80), the position of indwelling(OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 2.03-2.85); Unmodifiable factors: APACHEII scores (OR: 1.84, 95%CI: 1.54-2.20), Age≥ 60 years old (OR: 2.19, 95%CI: 1.76-2.73), the extensive use of antibiotic (OR: 3.54, 95%CI: 1.65-7.61), Diabetes mellitus (OR: 3.06, 95%CI: 2.56-3.66), Immunosuppression (OR: 2.87, 95%CI: 2.08-3.95). CONCLUSIONS: Effective interventions targeting the above modifiable factors may reduce the risk of developing CRBSI in ICU and improve the clinical outcome of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(3)2024 Mar 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442980

RESUMO

A woman in her 40s presented to the emergency department (ED) with a 3-week history of nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. Blood cultures were positive for Serratia and Pantoea agglomerans spp. One month before her ED visit, she underwent targeted uterine artery embolisation with particles by an interventional radiologist. Uterine artery embolisation is considered a safe alternative to surgical removal of fibroids or hysterectomy. The patient was initially treated with targeted antibiotics for a large infected uterine fibroid but ultimately required a hysterectomy for source control. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of P. agglomerans infecting a uterine fibroid.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Leiomioma , Pantoea , Embolização da Artéria Uterina , Feminino , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Clin Transplant ; 38(3): e15285, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38516923

RESUMO

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) account for 18% of bacterial infections in the first year after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Enterococcus accounts for up to 20% of BSIs in this population, with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) posing a particular risk. This is a retrospective, case-control study of adult liver and kidney transplant recipients between 01/01/2016 and 06/30/2021 that characterizes the epidemiology and outcomes of enterococcal BSIs in liver and kidney transplantations at a single institution. Subjects with an enterococcal BSI within the first 6 months post-transplant were compared to those with non-enterococcal BSIs in the same period. We identified 26 subjects with enterococcal BSIs and 28 controls with non-enterococcal BSIs (n = 54; 10.3%). Cases were mostly liver transplant recipients (n = 20; 77%) with a median MELD at transplant of 33 (range 14-43); controls included 14 KT recipients (50%). Groups differed significantly (all p < .05) by factors including perioperative transfusion requirements, need for reoperation, and number of interventions post-transplant. Cases had a median time of 25.5 days to infection and controls 100.5 days (p < .0001). There were no differences in 1-year mortality between the groups. Enterococcus faecium was the predominant species of Enterococcus (n = 23; 88.5%), with a majority (91.3%) of the isolates being VRE. In our liver and kidney transplants, enterococcal BSIs occurred early among liver transplant recipients. The high incidence of VRE among E. faecium isolates in this population warrants further investigation into the optimal approach to empiric antimicrobials for bacteremia in the early post-transplant period.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Transplante de Rim , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/etiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Fígado , Fatores de Risco
5.
Dermatol Surg ; 50(5): 428-433, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318842

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is widely used in dermatologic surgery to prevent surgical site infections and bacteremia, which can lead to prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and infective endocarditis (IE) in high-risk populations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of bacteremia, PJI, and IE after dermatologic surgery and assess the current evidence for antibiotic prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the computerized bibliographic databases was performed using key terms from the date of inception to March 21, 2021. Data extraction was performed independently by 2 data extractors. RESULTS: The review resulted in 9 publications that met inclusion criteria, including 5 prospective cohort studies and 4 case reports or case series. The prospective studies reported a wide range of bacteremia incidence (0%-7%) after dermatologic surgery. No cases of PJI resulting directly from cutaneous surgery were identified, and only 1 case series reported IE after various skin procedures. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a low rate of bacteremia and a lack of direct evidence linking dermatologic surgery to PJI or IE. The scarcity of published data on this topic is a limitation, highlighting the need for further research, particularly randomized controlled trials, to guide antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Bacteriemia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Incidência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Endocardite/epidemiologia , Endocardite/etiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
6.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 25, 2024 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419046

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Intravascular catheters are crucial devices in medical practice that increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), and related health-economic adverse outcomes. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of published automated algorithms for surveillance of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). METHODS: We performed a scoping review based on a systematic search of the literature in PubMed and EMBASE from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated predictive performance of automated surveillance algorithms for CLABSI/CRBSI detection and used manually collected surveillance data as reference. We assessed the design of the automated systems, including the definitions used to develop algorithms (CLABSI versus CRBSI), the datasets and denominators used, and the algorithms evaluated in each of the studies. RESULTS: We screened 586 studies based on title and abstract, and 99 were assessed based on full text. Nine studies were included in the scoping review. Most studies were monocentric (n = 5), and they identified CLABSI (n = 7) as an outcome. The majority of the studies used administrative and microbiological data (n = 9) and five studies included the presence of a vascular central line in their automated system. Six studies explained the denominator they selected, five of which chose central line-days. The most common rules and steps used in the algorithms were categorized as hospital-acquired rules, infection rules (infection versus contamination), deduplication, episode grouping, secondary BSI rules (secondary versus primary BSI), and catheter-associated rules. CONCLUSION: The automated surveillance systems that we identified were heterogeneous in terms of definitions, datasets and denominators used, with a combination of rules in each algorithm. Further guidelines and studies are needed to develop and implement algorithms to detect CLABSI/CRBSI, with standardized definitions, appropriate data sources and suitable denominators.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Infecção Hospitalar , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/microbiologia , Atenção à Saúde
7.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(Suppl 1): 153-159, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385389

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria have increased globally. Solid-organ transplant recipients are more prone to these infections. This study aimed to compare the clinical courses of carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections and to identify risk factors for carbapenem resistance in solid-organ transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this retrospective descriptive study, data for solid-organ transplant recipients (age ≥18) treated from 2015 to 2022 were obtained from medical records. Enterobacteriaceaepositive blood culture was screened from laboratory data. RESULTS: Among 72 patients, there were 100 bacteremia episodes. Patients included 40 kidney (55.6%), 21 liver (29.2%), 7 heart (9.7%), and 4 combined liver and kidney (5.6%) transplant recipients. Fifty-seven bacteremia episodes were recorded between 2015 and 2020, and 43 bacteremia episodes were recorded between 2020 and 2022. Carbapenem resistance was reported in 15.8% of patients before 2020, whereas this rate increased to 39.5% after 2020 (P = .007). Pitt bacteremia score ≥4 (P < .001), Charlson comorbidity index ≥4 (P = .021), chronic liver disease (P = .015), septic shock at admission (P = .001), hypotension at admission (P = .006), bacteremia episodes 48 hours after hospitalization (P = .004), hospitalization in the past 3 months (P = .004), and prior invasive procedure (P = .043) were significant factors for carbapenem resistance. Logistic regression analysis showed that bacteremia 48 hours after hospitalization (P = .002) and hospitalization in the past 3 months (P = .006) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem resistance increased significantly over the years. Bacteremia 48 hours after hospitalization and hospitalization within the past 3 months were determined to be risk factors for carbapenem resistance. Carbapenem-resistant infections are still nosocomial infections. Patients should be hospitalized for as a short time as possible, and both patients and their physicians should follow infection control and prevention methods.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Transplante de Órgãos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Carbapenêmicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos
8.
Eur J Haematol ; 112(5): 832-839, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294085

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: Bacteremia episodes from 2020 to 2022 from a prospective cohort of pediatric oncology patients with a central venous catheter were included. Episodes were classified by three medical experts following the CLABSI criteria as either a CLABSI or non-CLABSI (i.e., contamination, other infection source, or mucosal barrier injury-laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI)). Subsequently, they were asked if and why they (dis)agreed with this diagnosis following the criteria. The primary outcome was the percentage of episodes where the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis given following the CLABSI criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 84 bacteremia episodes in 71 patients were evaluated. Following the CLABSI criteria, 34 (40%) episodes were classified as CLABSIs and 50 (60%) as non-CLABSIs. In 11 (13%) cases the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis following the CLABSI criteria. The discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and clinical diagnosis was significant; McNemar's test p < .01. Disagreement by the experts with the CLABSI criteria mostly occurred when the experts found an MBI-LCBI a more plausible cause of the bacteremia than a CLABSI due to the presence of a gram negative bacteremia (Pseudomonas aeruginosa n = 3) and/or mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and the evaluation of the experts was observed. Adding Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an MBI pathogen and incorporating the presence of mucositis in the MBI-LCBI criteria, might increase the applicability.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Mucosite , Neoplasias , Sepse , Criança , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Curr Res Transl Med ; 72(1): 103422, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244302

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Venous access device-related bloodstream infection (VAD-BSI) with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Standard systemic antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated VAD-BSI with methicillin-resistant CoNS consists of intravenous (IV) vancomycin (vanco). This requires hospitalization, needs new competent venous access, exposes patients to potential toxicity (mainly renal) and increases the risk of commensal flora dysbiosis with selection of vanco-resistant enterococci. Combined with VAD management (removal or antibiotic locks), oral minocycline (mino) has been evaluated as an alternative systemic therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated VAD-BSIs with CoNS at our center, primarily when the reference treatment with IV vanco was not possible (renal failure or allergy) or when hospitalization was refused by patients. Here, we retrospectively report our single center experience with this mino-based approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2020, 24 uncomplicated VAD-BSIs with CoNS in 23 alloHCT patients were treated with oral mino as systemic antibiotic therapy in combination with VAD management. VAD were implantable ports (n = 17), tunneled catheter (n = 1) or PIC-lines (n = 6). Staphylococci were S. epidermidis (n = 21) or S. haemolyticus (n = 3). Mino was administered with a loading dose of 200 mg followed by 100 mg BID for 7-14 days. For 8 VAD-BSIs, patients were initially treated with IV vanco for the first 1-3 days followed by oral mino, while 16 VAD-BSIs were treated with oral mino as the sole antimicrobial agent for systemic therapy. VAD management consisted of catheter removal (for tunneled catheters and PIC-lines, n = 7) or antibiotic locks with vanco (n = 15) or gentamicin (n = 2) administered at least 3 times a week for 14 days (for ports). RESULTS: Overall, clearance of bacteremia (as assessed by negativity for the same CoNS of surveillance peripheral blood cultures drawn between day+ 3 and +30 after initiation of systemic therapy) was achieved in all but 1 patient (with port) who had persistent bacteremia at day +9. No complication such as suppurative thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, distant foci of infection or BSI-related death was observed in any patient during the 3-month period after initiation of treatment. Regarding the 17 port-BSI cases for which VAD conservative strategy was attempted, failure of 3-month VAD preservation was documented in 7/17 cases and 3-month recurrence of VAD-BSI was observed in 3/17 cases (with 1 patient with cellulitis). Treatment with mino was well tolerated except for a mild skin rash in one patient. CONCLUSION: Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety of this approach.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Minociclina/uso terapêutico , Coagulase/metabolismo , Coagulase/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos
10.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 26(1): e14228, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180287

RESUMO

Bloodstream infections (BSI) pose a substantial threat to the well-being and survival of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Risk factors for these infections vary across the different post-HSCT phases. In the pre-engraftment period, patients are particularly susceptible to infection due to prolonged neutropenia, mucosal damage, and extensive use of central venous line (CVL). In the post-engraftment phase, the emergence of graft versus host diseases further compounds the risk. The epidemiology of these infections has undergone notable changes over the years due to multifactorial reasons, including the evolution of protocols that intensify immunosuppression. In this context, the emergence of multi-drug resistance (MDR) microorganisms can be a challenge due to the elevated risk of mortality in these vulnerable patients. Unfortunately, there is a lack of comprehensive data on this topic, particularly in pediatrics. This article aims to provide a summary of the epidemiology of BSI in the different post-transplant phases and the impact of MDR pathogens. Having knowledge about the local epidemiology of BSI can be instrumental in tailoring targeted therapies, leading to improved survival rates in HSCT recipients.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Sepse , Humanos , Criança , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco
11.
BMC Nephrol ; 25(1): 3, 2024 01 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38172734

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Bloodstream Infections (BSI) are a major cause of death and hospitalization among hemodialysis (HD) patients. The rates of BSI among HD patients vary and are influenced by local patient and pathogen characteristics. Modifications in local infection prevention protocols in light of active surveillance of BSI has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to further explore factors associated with BSI in a contemporary cohort of HD patients at a public teaching hospital dialysis center in Israel. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of HD patients with a BSI in the years 2014 to 2018. The primary outcome was the occurrence of BSI. Secondary outcomes were to describe the causative pathogens of BSI, and to assess for risk factors for BSI, and mortality. RESULTS: Included were 251 patients. The mean age was 68.5 ± 13.4 years, 66.9% were male. The mean time from initiation of dialysis was 34.76 ± 40.77 months, interquartile range (IQR) 1-47.5 months and the follow up period of the cohort was 25.17 ± 15.9 months. During the observation period, 44 patients (17.5%) developed 54 BSI events, while 10 of them (3.9% of the whole cohort) developed recurrent BSI events. Gram-negative microorganisms caused 46.3% of all BSI events. 31.4% of these BSI were caused by resistant bacteria. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients receiving dialysis through a central line had a significantly increased risk for BSI adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 3.907, p = 0.005, whereas patients' weight was mildly protective (aOR 0.971, p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: We noted an increased prevalence of gram-negative pathogens in the etiology of BSI in HD patients. Based on our findings, additional empirical antibiotics addressing gram negative bacteria have been added to our empirical treatment protocol. Our findings highlight the need to follow local epidemiology for implementing appropriate preventative measures and for tailoring appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Sepse , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Sepse/complicações , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco
13.
Acta Med Port ; 37(2): 136-141, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37387411

RESUMO

Sclerotherapy with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate is the first-line endoscopic approach for gastric and ectopic variceal bleeding, but it can be associated with local or systemic complications. Episodes of transient bacteremia after the procedure are frequent, but documented cases of recurrent bacteremia are rare. The authors report a 47-year-old female patient with liver cirrhosis who underwent duodenal sclerotherapy with cyanoacrylate after upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Subsequently, she developed five episodes of bacteremia with unknown origin. A definitive diagnosis of recurrent bacteremia due to cyanoacrylate was only possible after an exhaustive study to exclude other infectious foci. This case highlights a rare complication in an unusual topography (ectopic varices) and with a high number of episodes of bacteremia. A multidisciplinary management was paramount due to the patient's high surgical and anesthetic risk, comorbidities, and surgical aggressiveness.


A escleroterapia com N-butil-2-cianoacrilato é a abordagem endoscópica de primeira linha nas hemorragias por varizes gástricas ou ectópicas, podendo estar associada a complicações locais ou sistémicas. São frequentes situações de bacteriemia transitória após o procedimento, mas são raros os casos documentados de bacteriemias recorrentes. O caso relata uma doente de 47 anos com cirrose hepática submetida a esclerose de varizes duodenais com cianoacrilato após hemorragia digestiva alta. Posteriormente, desenvolveu cinco episódios de bacteriémia sem foco evidente. O diagnóstico definitivo de bacteriemias recorrentes com ponto de partida no cianoacrilato só foi possível após estudo exaustivo para excluir outros focos infeciosos. Este caso evidencia uma complicação rara, numa topografia também incomum (varizes ectópicas) e com um elevado número de episódios de bacteriémia. Destaca-se a importância de uma abordagem multidisciplinar para gerir esta doente, tendo em conta as comorbilidades, o elevado risco anestésico e a agressividade cirúrgica para extração do foco infecioso.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas , Varizes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cianoacrilatos/efeitos adversos , Escleroterapia/efeitos adversos , Escleroterapia/métodos , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/complicações , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Varizes/complicações , Varizes/terapia , Bacteriemia/etiologia
14.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 26(1): e14200, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a component of multisystem organ failure that causes severe liver dysfunction in patients without underlying chronic liver disease. The patients with ALF are prone to have infections, including bacteremia. However, studies of the infectious impact for post liver transplantation (LT) in pediatric ALF are limited. We aimed to evaluate our current practice for pediatric LT cases of ALF with preoperative bacteremia. METHODS: The records of all patients under 18 years old undergoing LT for ALF in our center from November 2005 to December 2021 were collected. They were divided into two groups: those with a preoperative bloodstream infection (BSI) and those without (NBSI). We compared the preoperative status and also reviewed the details of the BSI group. Intraoperative course and postoperative outcomes were also compared. RESULTS: There were 19 BSI patients and 66 NBSI patients. One BSI case was detected on the day of LT. This patient had no changes in vital signs and general condition. After evaluation and therapeutic intervention by pediatric infectious disease specialists, LT was performed on the same day. Five cases developed septic shock at the time of detection of BSI. All BSI patients were in stable condition on the operation day with proper interventions. There were no significant differences in mortality and hospital stay between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LT might be able to be performed for pediatric ALF even with positive blood cultures. In addition, appropriate therapeutic intervention by specialists and patient's stable condition before LT are essential.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Doenças Transmissíveis , Falência Hepática Aguda , Transplante de Fígado , Sepse , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Falência Hepática Aguda/cirurgia , Falência Hepática Aguda/complicações
16.
J Perinat Med ; 52(1): 65-70, 2024 Jan 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37851590

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether maternal colonization with Group B Streptococcus increases the risk for infectious morbidity following transcervical Foley catheter-assisted cervical ripening. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comparing infectious morbidity and other clinical outcomes by Group B Streptococcus colonization status between all women with singleton pregnancies who underwent Foley catheter-assisted cervical ripening labor induction at a single tertiary medical center during 2011-2021. Multivariable logistic regression explored the relationship between Group B Streptococcus colonization to adverse outcomes while adjusting for relevant clinical variables. RESULTS: A total of 4,409 women were included of whom 886 (20.1 %) were considered Group B Streptococcus carriers and 3,523 (79.9 %) were not. Suspected neonatal sepsis rate was similar between Group B Streptococcus carriers and non-carriers (5.2 vs. 5.0 %, respectively, p=0.78). Neonatal sepsis was confirmed in 7 (0.02 %) cases, all born to non-carriers. Group B Streptococcus carriers had a higher rate of maternal bacteremia compared to non-carriers (1.2 vs. 0.5 %, respectively, p=0.01). Group B Streptococcus colonization was independently associated with maternal bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio 3.05; 95 %CI 1.39, 6.66). CONCLUSIONS: Group B Streptococcus colonization among women undergoing Foley catheter-assisted cervical ripening does not seem to increase the risk for neonatal infection. However, higher rates of maternal bacteremia were detected.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Sepse Neonatal , Ocitócicos , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse Neonatal/etiologia , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/efeitos adversos , Morbidade , Cateteres/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Streptococcus , Maturidade Cervical
18.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 15(1): 235-242, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713092

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of a tunneled catheter as the primary vascular access among old hemodialysis patients is frequent. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a common complication, associated with increased mortality. Data regarding the clinical presentation and outcomes of CRBSI among old hemodialysis patients is limited. METHODS: All chronic hemodialysis patients hospitalized between 2010 and 2022 with CRBSI were included. Patients were classified into two groups: old adults (≥ 75) and younger patients. Clinical, microbiological, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four patients with CRBSI were identified. Fifty-seven were aged ≥ 75 years. Mean age in the older and younger groups was 81.2 ± 5 and 59.7 ± 12.7, respectively. Male gender was predominant (64%). Charlson comorbidity score and Pitt bacteremia score were comparable among both groups. Norton score < 14 was more common among old persons (n = 24, 67% versus n = 21, 31%, p < 0.001), as well as nursing-home residence. Gram-negative pathogens and Staphylococcus aureus were common in both groups. The frequency of inappropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment was higher among older persons. Overall, in-hospital and 90-day mortality was high (age ≥ 75, 36.8%, age < 75, 24.7%, p = 0.14). Age was not significantly associated with mortality after adjustment for low Norton score, residence, and inappropriate antimicrobial therapy as well as resistance patterns of bloodstream isolates [OR = 1.2 (95% CI 0.4-3.3), p = 0.76]. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of CRBSI were comparable among old and young hemodialysis patients. However, the high mortality rate in this cohort suggests that the use of tunneled catheters as a permanent vascular access should be discouraged in both patient groups.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico
19.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(2): 195-199, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37295676

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital acquired infections (HAIs) are a major driver of morbidity and cost in health systems. Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) require intensive surveillance and review. All-cause hospital-onset bacteremia (HOB) may be a simpler reporting metric, correlates with CLABSI, and is viewed positively by HAI experts. Despite the ease in the collection, the proportion of HOBs that are actionable and preventable is unknown. Moreover, quality improvement strategies targeting it may be more challenging. In this study, we describe the bedside provider-perceived sources of HOB in order to provide insight into this new metric as a target for HAI prevention. METHODS: All cases of HOBs in 2019 from an academic tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Information was collected to assess provider-perceived etiology and associated clinical factors (microbiology, severity, mortality, and management). HOB was categorized as preventable or not preventable based on the perceived source from the care team and management decisions. Preventable causes included device-associated bacteremias, pneumonias, surgical complications, and contaminated blood cultures. RESULTS: Of the 392 instances of HOB, 56.0% (n = 220) had episodes that were determined not preventable by providers. Excluding blood culture contaminates, the most common cause of preventable HOB was secondary to CLABSIs (9.9%, n = 39). Of the HOBs that were not preventable, the most common sources were gastrointestinal and abdominal (n = 62), neutropenic translocation (n = 37), and endocarditis (n = 23). Patients with HOB were generally medically complex with an average Charlson comorbidity index of 4.97. This translated into a higher average length of stay (29.23 vs 7.56, P < .001) and higher inpatient mortality (odds ratio 8.3, confidence interval [6.32-10.77]) when compared to admissions without HOB. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of HOBs were not preventable and the HOB metric may be a marker of a sicker patient population making it a less actionable target for quality improvement. Standardization across the patient mix is important if the metric becomes linked to reimbursement. If the HOB metric were to be used in lieu of CLABSI, large tertiary care health systems that house sicker patients may be unfairly financially penalized for caring for more medically complex patients.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Infecção Hospitalar , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Redução do Dano , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/complicações , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Hospitais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...